1 |
Leibniz Dream: Children's comprehension of conjunctive expressions in Hungarian ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Leibniz Dream: Children's comprehension of conjunctive expressions in Georgian. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Children's production of quantifiers as sentence initial subjects in German and Italian ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
'Believe' is Strong but Subjective: Experimental Evidence from Hedging
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25; 497-514 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25; 497-514 ; 2629-6055 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Verum accent IS VERUM, but not always focus
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 188–202 ; 2473-8689 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Comprehension of the Presupposition Trigger Ye "Also" by Mandarin-Speaking Preschoolers With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorders
|
|
|
|
In: Frontiers in Psychology ; 11 (2020). - 570453. - Frontiers Research Foundation. - eISSN 1664-1078 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Reluctant Acceptance of the Literal Truth: Eye Tracking in the Covered Box Paradigm
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 61-78 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 61-78 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Scalar implicatures processing: slowly accepting the truth (literally)
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 573-590 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 573-590 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Homogeneity or implicature : an experimental investigation of free choice
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Homogeneity or implicature: An experimental investigation of free choice
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 29; 706-726 ; 2163-5951 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
On children's variable success with scalar inferences : insights from disjunction in the scope of a universal quantifier
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Developmental insights into gappy phenomena : comparing presupposition, implicature, homogeneity, and vagueness
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Children take only some sentences literally: investigating children's variable performance with scalar inferences
|
|
Bill, Cory. - : Sydney, Australia : Macquarie University, 2017
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Scalar implicatures versus presuppositions : the view from acquisition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Presupposition projection from the scope of none : universal, existential, or both?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Presupposition projection from the scope of None: Universal, existential, or both?
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 26; 754-774 ; 2163-5951 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Existential presupposition projection from none? : an experimental investigation
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The question of how presuppositions project from the scope of quantificational sentences, and in particular negative quantificational sentences such as none in (1), continues to be controversial, both theoretically and empirically: some theories only predict the existential presupposition projection reading in (1-a) (for example, [2, 3, 26, 13]), while others derive the universal projection reading in (1-b) ([15, 20, 21, 12, 10, 11], among others). In addition, any theory has to account for presupposition suspension, yielding an interpretation without a (global) presupposition (1-c). (1) None of the bears won the race. a. At least one of the bears participated and none of them won. b. All of the bears participated and none of them won. c. None of the bears both participated and won. Previous empirical studies have found evidence for universal projection ([7]), while others have provided evidence for alternatives to universal projection ([24, 14]). To our knowledge, however, there exists no definitive positive evidence for the existential reading in (1-a). We report a study that directly compares the existential, universal, and presuppositionless readings of (1) through the use of a ‘covered box’ picture selection task [16, 5]. We find clear evidence for existential readings (as well as presuppositionless readings), but no evidence for universal ones. This result challenges theories that predict only universal readings. Our results, taken together with those reported in [7], suggest that any adequate account of presupposition projection must be able to explain all three interpretive options in (1).
|
|
Keyword:
English language; presupposition (logic); semantics; XXXXXX - Unknown
|
|
URL: http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:44506 http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mVkOTk2N/AC2015-proceedings.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|